Re: Instant Death


8 Mar 1995 17:02:56 GMT

In article <3jk4pq$1o3@nic.lth.se>, Magnus Olsson <mol@marvin.df.lth.se> wrote:

>>Personally, I'd like to see more reviews and analyses of the better games.
>
>There is a lot of reviews in SPAG. So far, the focus seems to be on
>getting at least one brief review of every games in existence; I
>suppose that when that objective is fulfilled, we'll see more in-depth
>analyses of the better games. But maybe I should leave it to Whizzard
>to comment on that :-).

Ok. Here's the deal on that. The only games I don't like to accept
repeat reviews for are the Infocom games. Why?

1. There are plenty of '80s magazines with Infocom revies in them.
2. If I accepted repeats on those games, we'd have to sit through 80
reviews of every one of them. That gets old, no matter how original the
opinion.

Any other game I will gleefully accept duplicate reviews for. But then,
I don't writes 'em, I just edits 'em.

-- 
<~~TREV ERA~~~~~~~~~~~~~SIGHT~UNSEEN~~~~~~~~NO~RELEASE~DATE~YET~~~~~~|~~~~~~~>
<  I      W  In the jungle of the big city, a predator stalks one    |  ~~\  >
<  GO  SOFT  he considers easy prey, a blind student.  Feel the fear | /~\ | >
<______________________________________whizzard@uclink.berkeley.edu__|_\__/__>