>>Personally, I'd like to see more reviews and analyses of the better games.
>
>There is a lot of reviews in SPAG. So far, the focus seems to be on
>getting at least one brief review of every games in existence; I
>suppose that when that objective is fulfilled, we'll see more in-depth
>analyses of the better games. But maybe I should leave it to Whizzard
>to comment on that :-).
Ok. Here's the deal on that. The only games I don't like to accept
repeat reviews for are the Infocom games. Why?
1. There are plenty of '80s magazines with Infocom revies in them.
2. If I accepted repeats on those games, we'd have to sit through 80
reviews of every one of them. That gets old, no matter how original the
opinion.
Any other game I will gleefully accept duplicate reviews for. But then,
I don't writes 'em, I just edits 'em.
-- <~~TREV ERA~~~~~~~~~~~~~SIGHT~UNSEEN~~~~~~~~NO~RELEASE~DATE~YET~~~~~~|~~~~~~~> < I W In the jungle of the big city, a predator stalks one | ~~\ > < GO SOFT he considers easy prey, a blind student. Feel the fear | /~\ | > <______________________________________whizzard@uclink.berkeley.edu__|_\__/__>